Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Multiple Intelligence: William Glasser

"Effective teaching might just be the hardest job there is" - William Glasser


What implications does this approach have for you as a student and as a tutor?

As a student and a tutor, I agree with Glasser’s approach to learning.While agreeing with Glasser, I also believe in finding one’s own balance between each of the parts of learning he states. While his might just be an overall percentage for each part, as each person is unique they all have different needs. For myself, I don’t know where 80% of personal experience would come from with a subject like math, chemistry or physics. Although theoretically I could think of experiences that COULD occur, these aren’t true experiences that would necessarily help. When I am studying for a test, in any of my classes, it is always helpful to first read what I need to know, be present for lessons, create visual stimuli like mind maps or colourful notes to help memorize the information, talk to classmates about the material, experiment with certain aspects of the course and finally help others learn the material in order to reinforce my own knowledge of the coursework. All of these steps I have personally come up with, are not exact percentages as Glasser states, rather it is what I can fit into my time and what I need help on myself. Thus, while the backbone of his theory is correct it is too general for it to be a set plan.

 As a tutor, I agree somewhat like how I agree as a student with the foundation being correct but again each student is DIFFERENT. With each student being different, they are going to need separate plans in order to help them succeed. Again, the breakdown of how each part helps people to learn, for tutoring if you do not know the material it doesn’t help so the 95% allotted to that way people learn does not really make sense. Thus, like being a student the theory stated by Glasser is too general to have every student you tutor be using the same percentages.



Modifications for Each Learning Style

According to an article on the University of Indiana website, auditory learners retain information through hearing and speaking and often like to produce their own notes and summaries to memorize the material. For these students, I would pre-record the lesson, with the needed visuals much like Khan Academy does, and have them watch these during the class period while giving them the objectives of the lesson and having them produce their own notes, then summaries. To better help and engage these students I would have them also meet with other students who are auditory learners in order to compare notes/summaries.

The same article presents visual learners as needing visual objects such as graphs, charts, pictures, and seeing information in order to memorize material. These students would also listen to the pre-recorded lessons, needing to take their own notes. These notes will then need to be put onto Bristol board or any other form of board to show their knowledge of the material. They will be in charge of creating the visual stimuli for the whole class, as part of their mark.

For kinesthetic learners, the article explains them as liking to use their own hands to learn. These students would again listen to the pre-recorded lessons and create their own notes, however these students will demonstrate to the rest of the class through presentations the material they are learning. These students will be encouraged to work as hard as they can for 20 minutes, where a break will be encouraged. They will also be encouraged to be as physical as they need to, in order to stay on track and get their work done.


As all students will listen to the pre-recorded lessons, I will simply be there to help fill in any blanks or help any student who does not get the lesson on their own. The pre-recorded lessons are there to encourage classwork to be done in class, so that I am there to help them immediately rather than at a separate time. 

Experiential Learning

Many parents worry when a new curriculum is decided in the province. Just recently the new curriculum for sexual education has created a ton of feedback, some good some bad, from parents all across the province. The new curriculum has started to face the facts of TODAY’S society that people are not just heterosexual anymore. The newly added information on sexual orientation, gender identity, and sexting, are concepts parents worry their children aren’t mature enough for yet. This change has caused many parents to be mad and this is only learning about it. While in this case you can’t experience it experimentally, the fact that just LEARNING about this information, that has been long overdue to be added, has caused such an outcry from parents is hysterical. Thus, when just learning about new things in a simple class like physical and health education because you worry your children aren’t 'mature' enough, imagine if students were asked to do more experiential learning.

 Why improve sex education for kids when they can easily access porn sites?




No comments:

Post a Comment